The Federal Reserve has made it clear that as their confidence in the path of disinflation has grown, they have increasingly focused their attention on labor market data.
The recent triggering of the Sahm Rule—a more than 0.5% rise in the three-month moving average of the unemployment rate relative to the minimum over the past year—shook markets and sparked an equity sell-off given the rule’s historical accuracy, correctly predicting the onset of every recession since 1970. Surprisingly, however, the signals that can be gleaned from today’s labor market require a more nuanced interpretation than the Sahm rule alone. And in fact, the balance of evidence points to a labor market skewing less weak, and less recessionary, than once thought.
Traditional labor market data has become harder to interpret due to noisy revisions and potential measurement issues, complicating the task for policymakers. As a result, the data-dependent Federal Reserve may be navigating the labor market without clear direction, raising the likelihood of frequent shifts in Fed perspectives and commentary which in turn keeps market volatility at elevated levels, and the future path for rates uncertain.
What is the labor market data trying to say?
Don’t be mistaken; the labor market is indeed moderating, but the impact has so far been seen through just a softening in labor demand rather than actual layoffs.
For example, the JOLTs survey highlights that job openings have come down significantly since the peak of the pandemic. There is just one job per unemployed worker now, down from a peak of two jobs per unemployed worker in March 2022.